Insights for litigation teams
Legal Tech & AI
Technology competence, confidentiality, AI ethics, OCR, APIs and MCP for law firms.
Legal Tech & AIABA Formal Opinion 512: What It Actually Requires of Your Firm’s AI UseABA Formal Opinion 512 explained rule by rule: competence, client consent, disclosure, candor, supervision and AI billing, plus a checklist for firm policy.
Legal Tech & AIAI-Assisted Document Review: Ethics, Verification and a Workflow You Can DefendAI document review ethics for litigation teams: where AI enters review, how each stage fails, sampling and verification steps, and how to document it.
Legal Tech & AIAutomating Litigation Support With APIs: Five Workflows Worth Building FirstLegal API automation for litigation teams: which tasks to automate, five starter workflows, token and safety practices, and how to brief a developer clearly.
Legal Tech & AIChoosing Litigation Support Software: The Buyer’s Checklist Firms Actually NeedA buyer’s checklist for litigation support software: what to evaluate, vendor questions, a weighted scorecard, how to run a real trial and red flags to avoid.
Legal Tech & AIClient Confidentiality and Cloud Software: Vet Vendors, Close the Intake GapA cloud software client confidentiality guide for law firms: what Rule 1.6(c) expects, vendor questions to ask, and safer client intake and file sharing.
Legal Tech & AIThe Duty of Technology Competence in Practice: A Skills Map for Litigation TeamsThe duty of technology competence lawyers owe under Rule 1.1, made practical: the skills litigation teams need, a self-assessment and a 90-day plan.
Legal Tech & AIMCP for Law Firms: Connecting AI Assistants to Case Data Without Losing ControlMCP for law firms: how the Model Context Protocol connects AI assistants to case software, what it can do, the real risks and a governance checklist.
Legal Tech & AIOCR for Legal Documents and Screenshots: Getting Text You Can Actually TrustHow to OCR legal documents and screenshots reliably: why chat screenshots fail, scanning settings, verification levels, the redaction trap and a workflow.
Legal Tech & AIPreventing AI Hallucinations in Legal Work: A Verification ProtocolHow to prevent AI hallucinations legal teams keep running into: fake citations, invented facts and wrong dates, plus a verification protocol and red flags.
Legal Tech & AIRule 5.3 and AI: Supervising the Assistant You Can’t InterviewRule 5.3 AI guidance for law firms: firm-level measures, supervision duties, vendor diligence, verification checkpoints and sample AI policy wording.
Legal Tech & AIThe Small-Firm Legal Tech Stack: Build It Around Workflows, Not AppsHow to build a small law firm tech stack: the eight layers a litigation practice needs, what to buy first, a security baseline and costly mistakes.
No articles match that search yet. Try a shorter phrase.
CourtBriefly
Spend the week on the case, not the exhibits.
CourtBriefly turns raw message dumps and scattered client files into reviewed, Bates-stamped, source-linked hearing materials — for paralegals, attorneys and the clients who send them everything at once.
- Bates-stamped message logs with index + manifest
- Originals hashed the moment they arrive
- Client requests with missing-item tracking
- Attorney approval on the submitted version
- Source-linked hearing binders
- API & MCP for your own tools
Free plan with no card, or try Full Suite free for 7 days (card required; cancel before it ends and you pay nothing). Additional client workspaces are $25/mo each.
Simple pricing
Free1 matter · 10 evidence items
$0Full Suiteor $199/yr — AI included
$24.99/moMessage Logper matter, one-time
$39